<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.clickable.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clickable’s Analysis Of Bing</title><link>http://www.clickable.com/advertising/blogs/clickableblog/archive/2009/06/19/clickable-s-analysis-of-bing.aspx</link><description>Inspired by Fred Wilson and our own Clickable SEM Guru Ehren , the team at Clickable decided to test Bing , Microsoft&amp;rsquo;s new search engine, for a week and then report our results. In fact, we installed the Bing add-on for Firefox , the browser engine</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 40623.6204)</generator><item><title>Baby names search - Search for b</title><link>http://www.clickable.com/advertising/blogs/clickableblog/archive/2009/06/19/clickable-s-analysis-of-bing.aspx#1541</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:44:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c5e5dd70-6f17-4da5-9647-92d9c01a68d5:1541</guid><dc:creator>Baby names search - Search for b</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Baby names search - Search for b&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.clickable.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1541" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Clickable’s Analysis Of Bing</title><link>http://www.clickable.com/advertising/blogs/clickableblog/archive/2009/06/19/clickable-s-analysis-of-bing.aspx#1469</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:42:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c5e5dd70-6f17-4da5-9647-92d9c01a68d5:1469</guid><dc:creator>John River</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;　　bing的姐姐bitch发牢骚说：“ 俺弟弟的市场份额咋不见起色？！”我（何健）说：“bing他有病。即使他成功了，也只代表他成功。侬发啥飙！在共赢的理念下，你俩是陌生人！侬还是老老实实从事性服务业吧！去台湾，那里的刘老（刘兆玄）很欢迎侬！”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;——摘自《何健语录》，欢迎转载，谢谢支持！&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.clickable.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1469" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Clickable’s Analysis Of Bing</title><link>http://www.clickable.com/advertising/blogs/clickableblog/archive/2009/06/19/clickable-s-analysis-of-bing.aspx#1468</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:40:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c5e5dd70-6f17-4da5-9647-92d9c01a68d5:1468</guid><dc:creator>John River</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;　　bing的姐姐bitch发牢骚说：“ 俺弟弟的市场份额咋不见起色？！”我（何健）说：“bing他有病。即使他成功了，也只代表他成功。侬发啥飙！在共赢的理念下，你俩是陌生人！侬还是老老实实从事性服务业吧！去台湾，那里的刘老（刘兆玄）很欢迎侬！”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;——摘自《何健语录》，欢迎转载，谢谢支持！&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.clickable.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1468" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bing Is Impressive, But I&amp;#8217;m Sticking With Google | AttentionMax</title><link>http://www.clickable.com/advertising/blogs/clickableblog/archive/2009/06/19/clickable-s-analysis-of-bing.aspx#1435</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:47:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c5e5dd70-6f17-4da5-9647-92d9c01a68d5:1435</guid><dc:creator>Bing Is Impressive, But I’m Sticking With Google | AttentionMax</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Bing Is Impressive, But I&amp;#8217;m Sticking With Google | AttentionMax&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.clickable.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1435" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>| AttentionMax</title><link>http://www.clickable.com/advertising/blogs/clickableblog/archive/2009/06/19/clickable-s-analysis-of-bing.aspx#1434</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:31:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c5e5dd70-6f17-4da5-9647-92d9c01a68d5:1434</guid><dc:creator>| AttentionMax</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;| AttentionMax&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.clickable.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1434" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Clickable’s Analysis Of Bing</title><link>http://www.clickable.com/advertising/blogs/clickableblog/archive/2009/06/19/clickable-s-analysis-of-bing.aspx#1433</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:14:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c5e5dd70-6f17-4da5-9647-92d9c01a68d5:1433</guid><dc:creator>Tom O'Brien</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Max:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interesting review - we do a lot of image searching in our work and everyone is using Bing. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think Bing is much better for b to b &amp;nbsp;search (lots of what I do)than google.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Finally I was really surprised with the results on a health term search yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Try searching on Bing for COPD&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=copd&amp;amp;form=OSDSRC"&gt;www.bing.com/search&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Way better results that the search on Google.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TO&amp;#39;B&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.clickable.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1433" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>